<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In defense of 2000 bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/</link>
	<description>blogging / programming / technology / lifehacks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19458</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19458</guid>
		<description>AJ - When people upload their own photos to things like MyBlogLog, the photo compilation doesn't have any sort of uniformity other than the photo size. People upload photos of cats, they use cartoons, animated gifs... The 2000 Bloggers Project looks like an art project. It looks like thought went into it - because it did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AJ - When people upload their own photos to things like MyBlogLog, the photo compilation doesn&#8217;t have any sort of uniformity other than the photo size. People upload photos of cats, they use cartoons, animated gifs&#8230; The 2000 Bloggers Project looks like an art project. It looks like thought went into it - because it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyCatBlogLog Public Alpha &#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19226</link>
		<dc:creator>MyCatBlogLog Public Alpha &#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19226</guid>
		<description>[...] way to form a blog network without having the link thing be a problem on Technorati. One solution, suggested by //engtech was to do it in Flash. So I decided to experiment with a silly page featuring MyBlogLog bloggers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] way to form a blog network without having the link thing be a problem on Technorati. One solution, suggested by //engtech was to do it in Flash. So I decided to experiment with a silly page featuring MyBlogLog bloggers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J. Valliant</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19163</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J. Valliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19163</guid>
		<description>I guess I'm missing the point of having a site with 2000 pictures of people faces on it. It's slightly more interesting than a sheet of paper with 2000 names on it. I can't see what purpose it could serve aside from a confusing directory of blogs/link farm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m missing the point of having a site with 2000 pictures of people faces on it. It&#8217;s slightly more interesting than a sheet of paper with 2000 names on it. I can&#8217;t see what purpose it could serve aside from a confusing directory of blogs/link farm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19121</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19121</guid>
		<description>Great. I'm glad you like it. It's a wordpress theme designed for use as a community blog. I just changed the header and a few other things... :)
We could really use your help. You have some excellent ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. I&#8217;m glad you like it. It&#8217;s a wordpress theme designed for use as a community blog. I just changed the header and a few other things&#8230; :)<br />
We could really use your help. You have some excellent ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19072</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19072</guid>
		<description>Wow, the site is looking very nice Elaine.

That's a great layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the site is looking very nice Elaine.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine Vigneault</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19057</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Vigneault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-19057</guid>
		<description>FYI, 2000 Bloggers lives on at www.2kbloggers.com!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, 2000 Bloggers lives on at <a href="http://www.2kbloggers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.2kbloggers.com</a>!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18788</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18788</guid>
		<description>I do like your second suggestion: that the link go back to a central page and the bloggers featured on that page be changed randomly. That seems fair.

Generally, when a first-timer to my blog drops a link I take into account what their intentions appear to be. If they have something to say about my post, I expect them to say it in the comments. To me, "I blogged about this HERE, check it out" as the comment in its entirety reeks of withholding and narcissism, and when I am the one calling someone a withholding narcissist, you KNOW it's bad. 

I leave the comment stand, but I post what I think of that. It's pissed off some people...who never came before, and who never came back. I can afford to lose them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like your second suggestion: that the link go back to a central page and the bloggers featured on that page be changed randomly. That seems fair.</p>
<p>Generally, when a first-timer to my blog drops a link I take into account what their intentions appear to be. If they have something to say about my post, I expect them to say it in the comments. To me, &#8220;I blogged about this HERE, check it out&#8221; as the comment in its entirety reeks of withholding and narcissism, and when I am the one calling someone a withholding narcissist, you KNOW it&#8217;s bad. </p>
<p>I leave the comment stand, but I post what I think of that. It&#8217;s pissed off some people&#8230;who never came before, and who never came back. I can afford to lose them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2000 Bloggers - &#187; A little housekeeping, a little rambling, and a little attitude</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18776</link>
		<dc:creator>2000 Bloggers - &#187; A little housekeeping, a little rambling, and a little attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18776</guid>
		<description>[...] Engtech offers some great solutions put on our invidivual blogs? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Engtech offers some great solutions put on our invidivual blogs? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Karr</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18697</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18697</guid>
		<description>It was a great idea - exposing a lot of blogs to a lot of bloggers.  The good blogs would have rose to the top, the bad would have eventually fell off.  In a world with 55,000,000 blogs and hundreds more getting on every hour, 2,000 doesn't amount to a hill of beans!

I think what you actually spoke to here is the fact that there is a big 'ol fat gray area in the middle, and no one can determine where the line begins or ends.

Thanks engtech!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a great idea - exposing a lot of blogs to a lot of bloggers.  The good blogs would have rose to the top, the bad would have eventually fell off.  In a world with 55,000,000 blogs and hundreds more getting on every hour, 2,000 doesn&#8217;t amount to a hill of beans!</p>
<p>I think what you actually spoke to here is the fact that there is a big &#8216;ol fat gray area in the middle, and no one can determine where the line begins or ends.</p>
<p>Thanks engtech!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: envec69</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18628</link>
		<dc:creator>envec69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18628</guid>
		<description>one could argue that the same problem might appear with mybloglog. in the beginning most users were interesting in discovering new blogs and interacting, but now it looks like people are mass-joining communities to improve their visibility</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one could argue that the same problem might appear with mybloglog. in the beginning most users were interesting in discovering new blogs and interacting, but now it looks like people are mass-joining communities to improve their visibility</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2000 Bloggers - &#187; Welcome</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18581</link>
		<dc:creator>2000 Bloggers - &#187; Welcome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18581</guid>
		<description>[...] in a piece called In Defense of 2000 Bloggers: If all it was is a glorified linkfarm then I don’t think participants would have done things [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a piece called In Defense of 2000 Bloggers: If all it was is a glorified linkfarm then I don’t think participants would have done things [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baredfeetandteeth</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18321</link>
		<dc:creator>baredfeetandteeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/in-defense-of-2000-bloggers/#comment-18321</guid>
		<description>*deletes //engtech from her blogroll*

Joking Joking. I think people take their interweb far too seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*deletes //engtech from her blogroll*</p>
<p>Joking Joking. I think people take their interweb far too seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
