<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewme.com Reviewed - A Look at the Algorithm from a Bloggers Point of View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/</link>
	<description>blogging / programming / technology / lifehacks</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: trucchi casino on line</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-139057</link>
		<dc:creator>trucchi casino on line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-139057</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;swiss casino bonus code...&lt;/strong&gt;

Overall ganancias casinos portal web swiss casino bonus malette jeu de poker jeu poker gratui casino achat en ligne...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>swiss casino bonus code&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Overall ganancias casinos portal web swiss casino bonus malette jeu de poker jeu poker gratui casino achat en ligne&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey Bloggers, PayPerPost is Illegal &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-70467</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey Bloggers, PayPerPost is Illegal &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-70467</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers try to do paid reviews via a more ethical / legal service like reviewme.com, they may still be penalized by search engines (more recent) [1]. Search engines like Google use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers try to do paid reviews via a more ethical / legal service like reviewme.com, they may still be penalized by search engines (more recent) [1]. Search engines like Google use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Technorati Matter? (Searching for Violent Acres) &#171; Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-70443</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Technorati Matter? (Searching for Violent Acres) &#171; Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-70443</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati assigns each blog a ranking based on the number of blogs that have linked to it in the past nine months. The ranking says how many blogs have more links than you. You need about 3,000 links to reach the &#8220;coveted&#8221; Top 100 list. This ranking number is used by news aggregators like TechMeme and for blog advertising networks like ReviewMe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati assigns each blog a ranking based on the number of blogs that have linked to it in the past nine months. The ranking says how many blogs have more links than you. You need about 3,000 links to reach the &#8220;coveted&#8221; Top 100 list. This ranking number is used by news aggregators like TechMeme and for blog advertising networks like ReviewMe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-9298</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-9298</guid>
		<description>I actually never checked my account to see if the transaction happened.

I've send 4-5 bug reports about the fact that they aren't correctly parsing my stats but they've done nothing about it (not even a manual fix). They're marking me as $60 when I should be $250.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually never checked my account to see if the transaction happened.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve send 4-5 bug reports about the fact that they aren&#8217;t correctly parsing my stats but they&#8217;ve done nothing about it (not even a manual fix). They&#8217;re marking me as $60 when I should be $250.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Blogging Poet</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-9297</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Blogging Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-9297</guid>
		<description>I tried ReviewMe.com and &lt;a href="http://bloggingpoet.squarespace.com/bloggingpoetcom/2007/1/5/reviewmecom-still-in-arrears.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;didn't get paid&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried ReviewMe.com and <a href="http://bloggingpoet.squarespace.com/bloggingpoetcom/2007/1/5/reviewmecom-still-in-arrears.html" rel="nofollow">didn&#8217;t get paid</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-4078</guid>
		<description>My thoughts exactly skepticlawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly skepticlawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skepticlawyer</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-4076</link>
		<dc:creator>skepticlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-4076</guid>
		<description>We came up as a three star blog - and it was Alexa that let us down, much like you. We've also got a separate RSS feed for comments, which may not be the cleverest move. Still, I've shilled for my fifty bucks and it's likely we'll get some more work in the future. Blogitive isn't worth the money - US$50 covers costs nicely, $5 is pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We came up as a three star blog - and it was Alexa that let us down, much like you. We&#8217;ve also got a separate RSS feed for comments, which may not be the cleverest move. Still, I&#8217;ve shilled for my fifty bucks and it&#8217;s likely we&#8217;ll get some more work in the future. Blogitive isn&#8217;t worth the money - US$50 covers costs nicely, $5 is pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>Being on wordpress.com, I won't be signing up for &lt;a href="http://www.blogitive.com/2006/11/09/transfering-wordpresscom-to-your-own-domain-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow"&gt;blogitive &lt;/a&gt; at all. :)

Plus at $5 per posting, I'd have to write around 10 post an hour to make it worth my time. At which point I'd just be spamming, and destroying the signal-to-noise ratio on my blog.

I honestly wouldn't want to read a blog that had that many posts about subjects the author wasn't genuinely interested in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being on wordpress.com, I won&#8217;t be signing up for <a href="http://www.blogitive.com/2006/11/09/transfering-wordpresscom-to-your-own-domain-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">blogitive </a> at all. :)</p>
<p>Plus at $5 per posting, I&#8217;d have to write around 10 post an hour to make it worth my time. At which point I&#8217;d just be spamming, and destroying the signal-to-noise ratio on my blog.</p>
<p>I honestly wouldn&#8217;t want to read a blog that had that many posts about subjects the author wasn&#8217;t genuinely interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>Wow.  You put a lot of effort into that and I love it.

Have you signed up for any other services that pay you to blog, like Blogitive for example?  (They're at http://www.blogitive.com ) They're really ramping up now and putting the call our for bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  You put a lot of effort into that and I love it.</p>
<p>Have you signed up for any other services that pay you to blog, like Blogitive for example?  (They&#8217;re at <a href="http://www.blogitive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogitive.com</a> ) They&#8217;re really ramping up now and putting the call our for bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3890</guid>
		<description>Fantastic review. Thanks for the comment on my site too. Do hope you read it often :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic review. Thanks for the comment on my site too. Do hope you read it often :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>you came at it from the numbers point of view; and did a very good job, whereas I looked at it from the ethics (http://www.winextra.com/?p=116) but I didn't take the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you came at it from the numbers point of view; and did a very good job, whereas I looked at it from the ethics (http://www.winextra.com/?p=116) but I didn&#8217;t take the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review Me Review</title>
		<link>http://internetducttape.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Me Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 02:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/11/10/reviewmecom-reviewed-a-look-at-the-algorithm-from-a-bloggers-point-of-view/#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>[...] More on Review Me There are lots of other people talking about Reviewme.com like stuntdubl, werty, engtech, Working Blogger, and John Andrews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on Review Me There are lots of other people talking about Reviewme.com like stuntdubl, werty, engtech, Working Blogger, and John Andrews [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
